<?xml version="1.0"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.codeplex.com/rss.xsl"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>.NET Extensions Methods Library for C# and VB.NET (ASP.NET, MVC, SL, WPF, EF)</title><link>http://dnpextensions.codeplex.com/project/feeds/rss</link><description>The .NET Extensions project is monthly updated library of C&amp;#35; und VB.NET extension methods for ASP.NET Web Forms, MVC, WPF, Silverlight and Entity Framework. It&amp;#39;s part of a column published by Patrick A. Lorenz &amp;#40;www.pgk.de&amp;#41; in the German magazine &amp;#34;dotnetpro&amp;#34; &amp;#40;www.dotnetpro.de&amp;#41;.</description><item><title>Created Issue: Add int.Seconds and so on [6763]</title><link>http://dnpextensions.codeplex.com/workitem/6763</link><description>Sometimes it&amp;#39;s handy to quickly convert number to TimeSpan. Something like should do the trick. It&amp;#39;ll allow me to do 10.Seconds&amp;#40;&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;public static TimeSpan Seconds&amp;#40; this int seconds &amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;return TimeSpan.FromSeconds&amp;#40; seconds &amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>Ornus</author><pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:33:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: Add int.Seconds and so on [6763] 20120213053308P</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: Add IEnumerable&lt; string &gt;.Join [6756]</title><link>http://dnpextensions.codeplex.com/workitem/6756</link><description>there&amp;#39;s a string.Join method. It would be nice if an extension would be available for it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;something similar to&amp;#58; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;public static string Join&amp;#40;this IEnumerable&amp;#60;string&amp;#62; strings, string separator&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;if &amp;#40;strings &amp;#61;&amp;#61; null&amp;#41; throw new ArgumentNullException&amp;#40;&amp;#34;strings&amp;#34;&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;if &amp;#40;separator &amp;#61;&amp;#61; null&amp;#41; throw new ArgumentNullException&amp;#40;&amp;#34;separator&amp;#34;&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;return string.Join&amp;#40;separator, strings.ToArray&amp;#40;&amp;#41;&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: JamesCurran ** &lt;p&gt;Actually, this already exists in .NET 4  &amp;#40;It&amp;#39;s in the Enumerable class&amp;#41;&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>JamesCurran</author><pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:48:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: Add IEnumerable&lt; string &gt;.Join [6756] 20120210084832P</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: Add IEnumerable&lt; string &gt;.Join [6756]</title><link>http://dnpextensions.codeplex.com/workitem/6756</link><description>there&amp;#39;s a string.Join method. It would be nice if an extension would be available for it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;something similar to&amp;#58; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;public static string Join&amp;#40;this IEnumerable&amp;#60;string&amp;#62; strings, string separator&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;if &amp;#40;strings &amp;#61;&amp;#61; null&amp;#41; throw new ArgumentNullException&amp;#40;&amp;#34;strings&amp;#34;&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;if &amp;#40;separator &amp;#61;&amp;#61; null&amp;#41; throw new ArgumentNullException&amp;#40;&amp;#34;separator&amp;#34;&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;return string.Join&amp;#40;separator, strings.ToArray&amp;#40;&amp;#41;&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: Ornus ** &lt;p&gt;Appologies for double post.&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>Ornus</author><pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:15:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: Add IEnumerable&lt; string &gt;.Join [6756] 20120210051524P</guid></item><item><title>Created Issue: Add IEnumerable&lt; string &gt;.Join [6756]</title><link>http://dnpextensions.codeplex.com/workitem/6756</link><description>there&amp;#39;s a string.Join method. It would be nice if an extension would be available for it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;something similar to&amp;#58; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;public static string Join&amp;#40;this IEnumerable&amp;#60;string&amp;#62; strings, string separator&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;if &amp;#40;strings &amp;#61;&amp;#61; null&amp;#41; throw new ArgumentNullException&amp;#40;&amp;#34;strings&amp;#34;&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;if &amp;#40;separator &amp;#61;&amp;#61; null&amp;#41; throw new ArgumentNullException&amp;#40;&amp;#34;separator&amp;#34;&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;return string.Join&amp;#40;separator, strings.ToArray&amp;#40;&amp;#41;&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>Ornus</author><pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:14:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: Add IEnumerable&lt; string &gt;.Join [6756] 20120210051417P</guid></item><item><title>Created Issue: Add IEnumerable&lt; string &gt;.Join [6755]</title><link>http://dnpextensions.codeplex.com/workitem/6755</link><description>there&amp;#39;s a string.Join method. It would be nice if an extension would be available for it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;something similar to&amp;#58; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;public static string Join&amp;#40;this IEnumerable&amp;#60;string&amp;#62; strings, string separator&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;if &amp;#40;strings &amp;#61;&amp;#61; null&amp;#41; throw new ArgumentNullException&amp;#40;&amp;#34;strings&amp;#34;&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;if &amp;#40;separator &amp;#61;&amp;#61; null&amp;#41; throw new ArgumentNullException&amp;#40;&amp;#34;separator&amp;#34;&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;return string.Join&amp;#40;separator, strings.ToArray&amp;#40;&amp;#41;&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>Ornus</author><pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:09:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: Add IEnumerable&lt; string &gt;.Join [6755] 20120210050950P</guid></item><item><title>New Post: 'string' does not contain a definition for 'CanConvertTo'</title><link>http://dnpextensions.codeplex.com/discussions/289592</link><description>&lt;div style="line-height: normal;"&gt;Cool. I'm glad you got it working.
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;happy coding!&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>akronite</author><pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:34:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">New Post: 'string' does not contain a definition for 'CanConvertTo' 20120202123413A</guid></item><item><title>New Post: 'string' does not contain a definition for 'CanConvertTo'</title><link>http://dnpextensions.codeplex.com/discussions/289592</link><description>&lt;div style="line-height: normal;"&gt;&lt;p&gt;My bad, I change the &lt;strong&gt;Target framework &lt;/strong&gt;from ".NET Framework 4 Client Profile" to&amp;nbsp;".NET Framework 4" and it's ok.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No reference to System.Web is needed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>Tuizi</author><pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:32:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">New Post: 'string' does not contain a definition for 'CanConvertTo' 20120202123223A</guid></item><item><title>New Post: 'string' does not contain a definition for 'CanConvertTo'</title><link>http://dnpextensions.codeplex.com/discussions/289592</link><description>&lt;div style="line-height: normal;"&gt;Hi Tuizi,
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Have you got references to System.Web in your project?&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Try it and let us know if it work for you.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>akronite</author><pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:22:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">New Post: 'string' does not contain a definition for 'CanConvertTo' 20120202122203A</guid></item><item><title>New Post: 'string' does not contain a definition for 'CanConvertTo'</title><link>http://dnpextensions.codeplex.com/discussions/289592</link><description>&lt;div style="line-height: normal;"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'm just adding this library with NuGet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I see all the extensions in Intelliscence but, when I'm using a method, I can't compile!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For exemple, Im using the method&amp;nbsp;CanConvertTo&amp;lt;&amp;gt; on my string variable, and I get the error:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Error 1 'string' does not contain a definition for 'CanConvertTo' and no extension method 'CanConvertTo' accepting a first argument of type 'string' could be found&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt; What's wrong?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>Tuizi</author><pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:17:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">New Post: 'string' does not contain a definition for 'CanConvertTo' 20120202121746A</guid></item><item><title>New Post: Aggressive Namespace Polution</title><link>http://dnpextensions.codeplex.com/discussions/267395</link><description>&lt;div style="line-height: normal;"&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is awesome. Thanks so much for pushing a patch. I came back to check if there was any progress made on the issue. I hope Patrick will consider your patch.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I like your&amp;nbsp;conservative&amp;nbsp;approach with Object.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>bchavez</author><pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:22:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">New Post: Aggressive Namespace Polution 20120201072204P</guid></item><item><title>Source code checked in, #67465</title><link>http://dnpextensions.codeplex.com/SourceControl/changeset/changes/67465</link><description>Adding files I forgot last time.</description><author>JamesCurran</author><pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 08:07:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Source code checked in, #67465 20120128080724A</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: Add event.Raise extensions [6180]</title><link>http://dnpextensions.codeplex.com/workitem/6180</link><description>Checking for null in events every time sucks. It&amp;#39;d be nice if there would be extensions &amp;#40;simple and supporting generic event args&amp;#41; to make event invocation easier.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Example of what I&amp;#39;m talking about &amp;#40;from my code I frequently use in projects&amp;#41;&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;&amp;#47; &amp;#60;summary&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;&amp;#47; Call to raise generic event.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;&amp;#47; &amp;#60;&amp;#47;summary&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;&amp;#47; &amp;#60;param name&amp;#61;&amp;#34;eventHandler&amp;#34;&amp;#62;The event handler.&amp;#60;&amp;#47;param&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;&amp;#47; &amp;#60;param name&amp;#61;&amp;#34;source&amp;#34;&amp;#62;The source.&amp;#60;&amp;#47;param&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;public static void Raise&amp;#40; this EventHandler eventHandler, object source &amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;if&amp;#40; eventHandler &amp;#33;&amp;#61; null &amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;&amp;#9;eventHandler&amp;#40; source, new EventArgs&amp;#40;&amp;#41; &amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;&amp;#47; &amp;#60;summary&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;&amp;#47; Call to raise event with specific event arguments.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;&amp;#47; &amp;#60;&amp;#47;summary&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;&amp;#47; &amp;#60;typeparam name&amp;#61;&amp;#34;T&amp;#34;&amp;#62;Event arguments type.&amp;#60;&amp;#47;typeparam&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;&amp;#47; &amp;#60;param name&amp;#61;&amp;#34;eventHandler&amp;#34;&amp;#62;The event handler.&amp;#60;&amp;#47;param&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;&amp;#47; &amp;#60;param name&amp;#61;&amp;#34;source&amp;#34;&amp;#62;The source.&amp;#60;&amp;#47;param&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;&amp;#47; &amp;#60;param name&amp;#61;&amp;#34;e&amp;#34;&amp;#62;The event arguments.&amp;#60;&amp;#47;param&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;public static void Raise&amp;#60; T &amp;#62;&amp;#40; this EventHandler&amp;#60; T &amp;#62; eventHandler, object source, T e &amp;#41; where T&amp;#58; EventArgs&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;if&amp;#40; eventHandler &amp;#33;&amp;#61; null &amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;&amp;#9;eventHandler&amp;#40; source, e &amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;&amp;#47; &amp;#60;summary&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;&amp;#47; Call to raise event in response to a property being changed.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;&amp;#47; &amp;#60;&amp;#47;summary&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;&amp;#47; &amp;#60;param name&amp;#61;&amp;#34;eventHandler&amp;#34;&amp;#62;The event handler.&amp;#60;&amp;#47;param&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;&amp;#47; &amp;#60;param name&amp;#61;&amp;#34;source&amp;#34;&amp;#62;The source.&amp;#60;&amp;#47;param&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;&amp;#47; &amp;#60;param name&amp;#61;&amp;#34;propertyName&amp;#34;&amp;#62;Name of the property.&amp;#60;&amp;#47;param&amp;#62;&lt;br /&gt;public static void Raise&amp;#40; this PropertyChangedEventHandler eventHandler, object source, string propertyName &amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;if&amp;#40; eventHandler &amp;#33;&amp;#61; null &amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;&amp;#9;eventHandler&amp;#40; source, new PropertyChangedEventArgs&amp;#40; propertyName &amp;#41;&amp;#41;&amp;#59; &lt;br /&gt;&amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: Ornus ** &lt;p&gt;While initializing with blank delegate is one workaround, it has it&amp;#39;s own drawbacks&amp;#58; http&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;stackoverflow.com&amp;#47;questions&amp;#47;840715&amp;#47;the-proper-way-of-raising-events-in-the-net-framework&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>Ornus</author><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 19:11:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: Add event.Raise extensions [6180] 20120118071116P</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: ExtractDigits [6587]</title><link>http://dnpextensions.codeplex.com/workitem/6587</link><description>Browsing through the code, I noticed that I could improve ExtractDigits.  Below are two different improved version.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;ExtractDigits3 is fastest overall, but ExtractDigits2 is easier to read.  Both are significantly faster than the current version.&lt;br /&gt;Normalized timings&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;ExtractDigits &amp;#40;current&amp;#41;       6.27&lt;br /&gt;ExtractDigits2                  1.31&lt;br /&gt;ExtractDigits3                  1.00&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;public static string ExtractDigits2&amp;#40;this string value&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;return string.Join&amp;#40;null, value.Where&amp;#40;Char.IsDigit&amp;#41;&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;public static string ExtractDigits3&amp;#40;this string value&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;return value.Where&amp;#40;Char.IsDigit&amp;#41;.Aggregate&amp;#40;new StringBuilder&amp;#40;value.Length&amp;#41;, &amp;#40;sb, c&amp;#41; &amp;#61;&amp;#62; sb.Append&amp;#40;c&amp;#41;&amp;#41;.ToString&amp;#40;&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: JamesCurran ** &lt;p&gt;Fixed in Change Set 66651&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>JamesCurran</author><pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 15:03:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: ExtractDigits [6587] 20111223030355P</guid></item><item><title>Source code checked in, #66822</title><link>http://dnpextensions.codeplex.com/SourceControl/changeset/changes/66822</link><description>Resolves &amp;#35;6672 - GetOriginalException reproduces .NET GetBaseException - Marked GetOriginalException as deprecated&amp;#13;&amp;#10;</description><author>nathankoop</author><pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 14:45:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Source code checked in, #66822 20111219024513P</guid></item><item><title>New Post: Subversion, missing some files when getting latest</title><link>http://dnpextensions.codeplex.com/discussions/283240</link><description>&lt;div style="line-height: normal;"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hey there,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Just wanted to peek at the code and try and help with some stuff.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;I'm running VS2010 and subversion. I used the subversion link from the Source Code tab (&lt;strong&gt;https://dnpextensions.svn.codeplex.com/svn&lt;/strong&gt;) and it grabbed a lot of files, however it doesn't have some that it seems to expect.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The project PGK.Extensions.Benchmark is unavailable, there is no file nor any folder for that code, I checked via the TortoiseSVN repo browser and saw a number of files, but that folder doesn't appear to be there&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The following files in PGK.Extensions.Tests, are unavailable (and not in the SVN repo)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;CollectionExtensionsTest &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;ComparableExtensionsTests &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;DirectoryInfoExtensionsTest &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;TextReaderExtensionsTest &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Used_for_testing.txt &lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These appear to be all the files that I'm missing. I was wondering if:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;a) these files are no longer required, but still accidentally in the project&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;b) these files are required and for some reason aren't in the repo&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;c) I screwed up the retrieving of code&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nathan&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>nathankoop</author><pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 18:00:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">New Post: Subversion, missing some files when getting latest 20111216060015P</guid></item><item><title>Commented Issue: ExtractDigits [6587]</title><link>http://dnpextensions.codeplex.com/workitem/6587</link><description>Browsing through the code, I noticed that I could improve ExtractDigits.  Below are two different improved version.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;ExtractDigits3 is fastest overall, but ExtractDigits2 is easier to read.  Both are significantly faster than the current version.&lt;br /&gt;Normalized timings&amp;#58;&lt;br /&gt;ExtractDigits &amp;#40;current&amp;#41;       6.27&lt;br /&gt;ExtractDigits2                  1.31&lt;br /&gt;ExtractDigits3                  1.00&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;public static string ExtractDigits2&amp;#40;this string value&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;return string.Join&amp;#40;null, value.Where&amp;#40;Char.IsDigit&amp;#41;&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;public static string ExtractDigits3&amp;#40;this string value&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#123;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#9;return value.Where&amp;#40;Char.IsDigit&amp;#41;.Aggregate&amp;#40;new StringBuilder&amp;#40;value.Length&amp;#41;, &amp;#40;sb, c&amp;#41; &amp;#61;&amp;#62; sb.Append&amp;#40;c&amp;#41;&amp;#41;.ToString&amp;#40;&amp;#41;&amp;#59;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#125;&lt;br /&gt;Comments: ** Comment from web user: nathankoop ** &lt;p&gt;I believe this should be in fixed or closed status&lt;/p&gt;</description><author>nathankoop</author><pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 15:35:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Commented Issue: ExtractDigits [6587] 20111216033559P</guid></item><item><title>Created Issue: GetOriginalException reproduces .NET GetBaseException [6672]</title><link>http://dnpextensions.codeplex.com/workitem/6672</link><description>The GetOriginalException extension method for System.Exception appears to reproduce the GetBaseException method from .NET &amp;#40;http&amp;#58;&amp;#47;&amp;#47;msdn.microsoft.com&amp;#47;en-us&amp;#47;library&amp;#47;system.exception.getbaseexception.aspx&amp;#41;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It should be removed or deprecated.&lt;br /&gt;</description><author>ConcreteGannet</author><pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 01:18:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Created Issue: GetOriginalException reproduces .NET GetBaseException [6672] 20111212011820A</guid></item><item><title>Source code checked in, #66679</title><link>http://dnpextensions.codeplex.com/SourceControl/changeset/changes/66679</link><description>Added&amp;#58; TimeSpanExtensions &amp;#40;new&amp;#33;&amp;#41;&amp;#13;&amp;#10;    &amp;#43; MultiplyBy &amp;#40;int&amp;#41;&amp;#13;&amp;#10;    &amp;#43; MultiplyBy &amp;#40;double&amp;#41;&amp;#13;&amp;#10;</description><author>KleinRon</author><pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 20:10:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Source code checked in, #66679 20111211081044P</guid></item><item><title>Source code checked in, #66651</title><link>http://dnpextensions.codeplex.com/SourceControl/changeset/changes/66651</link><description>Lots &amp;#38; lots of new Unit tests &amp;#40;tripling total number of tests&amp;#41;.  Fixes to some bugs found by unit tests.  Plus a few optimizations.</description><author>JamesCurran</author><pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 12:16:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">Source code checked in, #66651 20111209121658P</guid></item><item><title>New Post: Is GetOriginalException redundant?</title><link>http://dnpextensions.codeplex.com/discussions/282073</link><description>&lt;div style="line-height: normal;"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hi there!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I assume you are right.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Would you like to submit a bug so I could assign it to the origin developer of the method?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Patrick&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><author>PatrickLorenz</author><pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 10:46:45 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">New Post: Is GetOriginalException redundant? 20111207104645A</guid></item></channel></rss>
